The State of the Parties – Scottish Greens


I’m risking the wrath of my former Better Nation colleague James for what’s coming here… but I really do think that Scottish “Greens” is a misnomer for the party who held onto their 2 MSPs in May’s election.  I’d suggest “Scottish Lefties who occasionally talk about the environment” would be a more appropriate (if slightly lengthy) name for the party.  And that for me, is the biggest issue facing the party at the moment.  I know James will tell me that the party “don’t just pick policies out of thin air – they are principles” and that’s all well and good.  But there are ways of maintaining those principles without radically changing.

When the party was led (well, okay, co-convened) by Robin Harper from his first election to the Scottish Parliament in 1999 until he stood down as co-convenor in 2008, the party actually talked about green issues. But since he was replaced by Patrick Harvie, the party has focused much more on left-wing, social issues rather than environmental issues.  Now, as I mentioned above, this IS a principled position (the Scottish Greens have always had a left-wing tendency) but I also perceive it to be something of an electoral strategy as well.



The State of the Parties – Scottish Lib Dems


I did wonder whether I should bother writing a post about the Lib Dems.  I mean, it appears to be patently obvious that the party has been utterly screwed by their participation in a coalition with the Conservatives at UK level, with the loss of 300,000 votes in May’s Scottish Parliament election symbolic of the electorate’s feelings towards the party.  But my look at the parties in the Scottish Parliament wouldn’t be complete without it…

I suppose the first thing to point out (which is pretty obvious) is that there is no real distinct Lib Dem voter.  I’ve been teaching first years at university who can identify that, at least traditionally, the working class vote Labour and the middle class vote Conservative.  But where do the Lib Dems fit into that?  Well, one answer to the question as to “who votes Liberal Democrat” was “middle class people who don’t think they are middle class”.  Which I liked – and I liked it, because it’s almost true.  Lib Dem voters – at least prior to 2010 – tended to be well-educated (with a degree) but still considered themselves to not be middle class enough to vote for the Conservatives.  Hence the choice of Lib Dems.


The State of the Parties – Scottish Tories


My post on Scottish Labour had a bit of a negative conclusion – that they had a couple of deep-rooted problems that as a party they don’t look like they’ve identified – but compared to that post, this will be the very epitome of doom & gloom.  The future of the Scottish Tories?  What future?

I’ll be honest, I was a little more optimistic about the Scottish Tories after the announcement there would be a leadership contest (though I called some of the names wrongly…) in June.  I thought that a youthful ticket of John Lamont (who ended up not standing) and Ruth Davidson as deputy would help the party appeal to a younger, post-Thatcher generation.  I still thought that Murdo Fraser would win at that point, and even that would have been a good outcome, since (even without his “abolish the party and start afresh” idea, his positioning vis-a-vis devolution would have given the party more relevance.  But with Ruth Davidson as leader, I can’t see the party moving forward – and, indeed, I suspect they’ll be back in this position, looking for a new leader, within 18 months.

Let me explain.   More

The State of the Parties – Scottish Labour


It is probably quite unfair to consider the state of Scottish Labour while they are in the middle of a leadership election…  and yet it is partly because they are in such a situation that looking at the party is so interesting.  And the verdict – at least from this outsider – isn’t good.

Truth be told, I think the Scottish Labour Party are in a worse position than the Scottish Liberal Democrats.  And that’s saying something.

It might be saying something crazy, especially since a party which saw 41 MPs elected 18 months ago appears (on the surface at least) to be in a much healthier position than one which saw their representation at Holyrood reduced to just five.  But bear with me.


The Return of the Malc


And yes, I know I’ve used that title before…

This blogging lark started out on “Malc in the Burgh” when I worked at Holyrood and missed writing.  When I got fed up, Jeff, James and I started a new venture and Better Nation was born.  The latter is still going, with new editors on board, but for me it began to feel a bit like a chore.  Not because of the people, I hasten to add, but just because writing as part of a group there feels like there’s more pressure to write stuff, and I was too busy to give it my full attention.  And though I still have a thesis to finish, I missed writing about other things, the half hour considerations of the news etc.  So I decided to start afresh on my own.  And this is the result.

Thinking Unpopular Thoughts.  Which makes sense to me, since a lot of the time I end up on a side of political debate which tends not to be that popular.  And justified by the Plato quote underneath, arguing that just because something is a majority opinion doesn’t mean it is correct.  And abbreviated to TUT, which is probably what a lot of you will think when reading my thoughts…

I don’t know how frequent, or how good, the writing will be.  It may fizzle out, it may go with a bang, but I just wanted my own space again.  So – here it is.  Happy for you to comment, argue, debate and discuss.  Just don’t be mean.  Or call me names.

%d bloggers like this: